General Social Theory or Resistant Knowledge Project?: The Public Life of Social Constructionism and Its Implications for Liberation Sociology

Allen, S. E.2025. “General Social Theory or Resistant Knowledge Project?: The Public Life of Social Constructionism and Its Implications for Liberation Sociology.” Sociological Forum40, no. S1: S29–S37. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.70015.

This paper explores contemporary conceptualizations of social constructionism. I specifically address three queries: (1) What is social constructionism? (2) How have understandings of social constructionism evolved as the concept has diffused into the public sphere? And, (3) In what ways does social constructionism’s public life impact liberation sociology in praxis? I ultimately argue that social constructionism, as a theory and framework, draws attention to the significant ways one’s standpoint epistemology influences knowledge construction and, as a result, has the radical potential to destabilize social systems and hierarchies by legitimizing socially situated viewpoints, especially those from oppressed and marginalized communities. Furthermore, I discuss how this framing shifts social constructionism from merely a general social theory to a resistant knowledge project to explain why it has faced challenges in the form of reductionism and repression. I conclude by acknowledging the continued utility of social constructionism moving forward, especially with regard to cultivating a liberation sociology.

Piketty and Patrimonialism: A Frankfurt School Critique of Piketty’s Use of Marx, Weber, Political Economy, and Comparative Historical Sociology

Bakker, J.I. 2019. “Piketty and Patrimonialism: A Frankfurt School Critique of Piketty’s Use of Marx, Weber, Political Economy, and Comparative Historical Sociology.” Chapter in Lauren Langman and David A Smith, eds. Twenty-First Century Inequality and Capitalism: Piketty, Marx, and Beyond (Studies in Critical Social Sciences). Brill.

Bakker develops a detailed historical argument (that also reflects on contributions of various Frankfurt School luminaries) and sees in Piketty, for all the empirical riches, a relative theoretical poverty, with the lack of attention to imperialism/colonialism, plus his failure to link the “baronial” influence of the modern day patrimonial elites to any form of class analysis.