Monthly Archives: June 2026

Managing Corporate Virtue: The Politics of Workplace Diversity in New York and Paris

Posted on by

Bereni, Laure, , Managing Corporate Virtue: The Politics of Workplace Diversity in New York and Paris (New York, NY
, 2025; online edn, Oxford Academic, 22 Sept. 2025), https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197785768.002.0004

A major tenet of contemporary capitalism holds that what is good for business can align with what is good for society. Efforts toward more diverse, equitable, and inclusive workplaces epitomize this rising ideology, termed responsible capitalism. An increasingly common managerial mantra is “diversity means business.” But how does it play out in the daily life of organizations? Drawing on interviews with diversity managers, a historical review of practitioner literature, and observations from organizations in New York City and Paris, Managing Corporate Virtue goes beyond the rhetoric of diversity initiatives to uncover the concrete challenges faced by those tasked with implementing them. This book reveals the persistent fragility of diversity efforts, which are often sidelined; subject to the variations of the legal, social, and political environment; and require constant efforts to sustain managerial support. Practitioners must prove their programs are neither merely virtue signaling nor the Trojan horse of political, legal, or moral pressures that would unsettle the corporate order. Ultimately, by exploring the day-to-day work of diversity managers in the United States and France, the book exposes the contradictions lurking beneath the neoliberal promise of harmony between profit and virtue.

Emotions and the Nation: Nation-Building, Nationhood Reproduction, Political Mobilization, and Change

Posted on by

Feinstein, Yuval (2026). “Emotions and the Nation: Nation-Building, Nationhood Reproduction, Political Mobilization, and Change.” Nationalities Papers.

This article examines recent developments in three key areas of nationalism research that integrate emotions into theoretical frameworks and empirical analysis. First, it explores studies that revisit historical nation-building through the lens of the history of emotions. Second, it discusses how the “affective nationalism” literature has shifted the focus of banal nationhood reproduction from mental representations to emotions. Third, it reviews efforts to theorize the emergence of intense national emotions in certain periods and their role in political mobilization and change. The article highlights critical advancements across these areas, particularly in linking emotions to meaning through narratives, expanding research from national centers to the frontiers, and challenging the illusion of national harmony by emphasizing power dynamics and dialectical change. The conclusion suggests future research directions, including investigations of national emotions within diasporic communities and digital networks.

Right-wing Populist Political Movements

Posted on by

Morgül, Kerem. (2025). “Right-Wing Populist Political Movements.” Pp.7-13 in D. Snow, D. McAdam, & D. Moss (eds), Contemporary Social Movements: Historical and Descriptive Accounts. Wiley Blackwell.

The twenty-first century has seen a marked rise in the political influence of the right-wing populist parties and movements, distinguished by antiestablishment rhetoric, ethnonationalist fervor, and authoritarian tendencies. This chapter analyzes the defining characteristics of this global trend and the factors driving its ascent. Right-wing populism is conceptualized as an amalgamation of populism, ethnonationalism, and authoritarianism. Populism is defined by the mobilization of unified people around a transgressive political endeavor, simplifying politics into a conflict between the sovereign people and self-serving elites. Ethnonationalism underscores a shared ethnic identity as the foundation for national belonging, frequently advocating stringent immigration controls. Authoritarianism is evident in centralized power, the erosion of the rule of law, and constrained political freedoms. The proliferation of right-wing populism has been particularly pronounced in Europe, with notable instances in Hungary, Poland, Italy, and the Netherlands. Influential populist figures like Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro have also emerged globally, often challenging democratic institutions and advancing (ethno)nationalist agendas. The chapter explores the implications of these movements for democratic governance and societal cohesion. The rise of right-wing populism is examined through demand-side and supply-side explanations.

Corporate Accountability and the Ecological Turn: Mining Lessons from the Rights of Nature Movement

Posted on by

Dale, John G. 2025. “Corporate Accountability and the Ecological Turn: Mining Lessons from the Rights of Nature Movement,” in Raluca Grosesçu and John G. Dale, eds., Corporate Accountability for Human Rights Violations: Civil Society and Transnational Action across the World (Series on Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights, vol.16, Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland), pp. 73-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-05569-9_4

As Big Tech-driven development of artificial intelligence and data mining becomes increasingly entangled with traditional practices of extractivist mining for oil, gas, coal, and precious metals and minerals, the corporate accountability movement now must take into consideration (living and non-living) nonhuman rights to adequately defend and mobilise support for the humans, communities, ecosystems, and knowledge being impacted. Drawing on relational approaches to rights projects, this chapter examines a transnational, Indigenous-led rights of nature movement in Ecuador that successfully pre-empted the rights and extractive practices of transnational and state-owned mining corporations while creating new rights to protect Indigenous communities, the Amazonian forests they inhabit, and novel legal forms of data ownership. I then compare this case to a U.S.-focused corporate accountability movement that had separately and differently constructed rights of nature to challenge corporate rights of extractivist development. I demonstrate how the rights of nature project in Ecuador subsequently engaged and influenced this U.S.-based rights project, including its relational discourse on rights of nature and community, political aims and strategies of corporate accountability, and its movement identity.

Social Bias in AI: Re-coding Innovation through Algorithmic Political Capitalism

Posted on by

Samuel O. Carter and John G. Dale. 2025. “Social Bias in AI: Re-Coding Innovation through Algorithmic Political Capitalism.” AI & Society (2025) 40:6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02540-2

This research examines the social dynamics underpinning algorithmic bias, proposing a framework for addressing these issues through the lens of algorithmic political capitalism. We explore how socio-technical-ecological relations of power often reproduce harmful algorithmic effects, including social bias, data exploitation in the knowledge economy, prejudiced predictions, and unexamined user biases that obscure power asymmetries and harm society. Building on complexity theory, particularly Morçöl’s definition of public policy as a dynamic system with co-evolving relationships between actors and systems, we analyze the challenges and opportunities to mitigate these harms within a multilayered framework. Our framework extends Keller and Block’s concept of ‘technology-dependent political capitalism’, incorporating mechanisms to ensure government assistance is conditional, allowing bicameral governance in supported corporations, and empowering local and state authorities to hold organizations accountable. Finally, we highlight the crucial roles of transparency, accountability, and democratization in fostering meaningful innovation, and argue that addressing algorithmic bias and the inequities of the knowledge economy requires a nuanced understanding of the interplay between public policy, technological systems, and societal structures. Our proposals aim to reshape the socio-technical-ecological landscape, creating conditions for algorithmic innovation that align with democratic values and equitable societal progress, while mitigating systemic violence.